The sample size is too small to perform any robust tests. He said on the come out roll that I should test for winning rolls of 7 and 11, and on all other rolls to test for rolling anything except a 7.

So I asked Beau what I should be testing for. So we both agreed one session was unlikely to prove anything.Īs I emphasize on the topic of Internet casino cheating the proper way to make a case for a non-random game is to set up a hypothesis first, then gather data, and then statistically test the data for how well it fits the hypothesis. However a slight influence could take thousands of rolls to become obvious over the normal randomness of the game. At a 3-4-5x odds table the house edge is only 0.374% so it only takes a slight influence of the dice to overcome that house advantage. So after playing phone tag we finally met on July 22 with three other dice setters at the Bellagio.īefore starting Beau explained that dice setters are not able to control every single throw but only influence the dice towards certain numbers. Until recently I also lived within about one mile of dice coach Beau Parker so there was no good reason to keep avoiding the experiment. Both were agreeable but due to scheduling problems nothing ever came of it. I had previously been in communication with Frank Scoblete and Larry Edell on the subject, suggesting that I be allowed to observe some top dice setters for myself. Wong's comments inspired me to take dice setting more seriously.

Craps dice game no